Missing History
in Blockpit?

Cost basis of zero because the purchase is missing. TX-Partner brings the history back.

Book a consultation

30 minutes · Consultation and quote free

9years Together in crypto accounting
Fixed price Cost certainty upfront
Independent Not tied to any tool
Robert Thorn Johannes Anderl

Robert & Johannes · personally review your data

Common Causes

The 3 Most Common Causes of “Missing History”

Blockpit shows the hint when the data before the first recorded inflow is missing for an asset.

01_MISSING_SOURCES

Sources never imported

An exchange or wallet was never connected. Blockpit sees the inflow but not where it came from. Often the first exchange or a briefly used account.

02_API_PERIOD

API only from the connection date

Exchange APIs deliver only from the connection date and not every transaction type. Bought in 2021, API connected in 2024: the old trades are missing.

03_AUTOCORRECTION

Manual entry and auto-correction

Both close the gap with a cost basis of zero. The holding adds up again, the calculation stays wrong.

What is special here

Which exchanges leave the most gaps

From Robert’s practice: these four platforms stand out when it comes to import gaps.

MEXC

Limited historical data

API and CSV often return restricted periods only. Older trades and transfers are then missing in Blockpit.

KUCOIN

Spot, futures and earn kept apart

In practice, spot, futures, trading bot and earn sit in separate areas. A single API import usually does not cover all of them.

BINANCE

Many products, gaps in the API

In practice the API often does not deliver spot, margin, futures, earn and convert in full. Without a CSV reconciliation, whole product areas are then missing.

TRADE_REPUBLIC

In practice only the CSV export

The export is imported manually and is partly incomplete on price and time data for crypto trades.

What that means

Cost basis of zero hits every later sale

When the purchase history is missing, Blockpit sets the cost basis to zero. The full proceeds become a gain, even when none was made.

The proceeds become the gain

A sale without a matching purchase counts as a gain in full. That scales into five figures quickly.

The holding period is no longer evidenced

The acquisition date disappears with the cost basis. The 12-month holding period can then not be derived from the data.

The gap travels

An inflow does not create a cost basis, it inherits it from the withdrawal before. A missing origin therefore runs through every transfer.

The silent case

The auto-correction balances the holding, the report looks clean. The hint stays, and so do the fictitious gains.

What TX-Partner makes of it

Sources first, then the cost basis.

01

Sources listed in full

Every exchange, wallet and chain ever used goes on the list. Typically forgotten: the first exchange, intermediate exchanges and hardware wallets.

02

Data recovered

CSV exports, the Article 15 GDPR data request and on-chain data from the explorer, in that order.

03

Cost basis established

Entries with a cost basis of zero get replaced by real transactions. After that TX-Partner triggers the recalculation.

Ready?

Close missing historyclose.for good.

30 minutes that make the difference.

Book a consultation 30 minutes · Consultation and quote free

If we are not the right fit for your case, we will say so in the call.

Frequently Asked Questions

What We Get Asked Most

Blockpit shows this warning when transactions for an asset are missing that occurred before the first recorded transaction. The tool then sets a cost basis of 0 EUR – on a later sale, the entire proceeds are calculated as taxable gain, even though the assets were originally purchased.
Yes. In most cases, missing transactions can be reconstructed using on-chain data, CSV exports from exchanges, or manual entries. The key is that all sources are systematically identified and the transaction history is built up completely.